The Soil Remembers What You Did

There's a field just outside the Bend that the Lindqvist twins have been arguing over since, best I can tell, the first Bush administration. One of them wants to put it in cover crops. The other says it's a waste of money. They haven't spoken in six years. The field sits there doing whatever the winning twin decides, which changes depending on who's winning, which neither of them knows. I drove past it last week and thought: this is what the whole national conversation about farming looks like. Two people who love the same land, standing on opposite sides of a fence, each certain the other one is ruining it.

I've been thinking about that fence a lot lately, on account of a study that's been making the rounds. An ecologist named Jonathan Lundgren pulled together a thousand farms to compare what they're calling regenerative agriculture against conventional agriculture. Now I know what you're thinking. You're thinking those words could mean anything, and you're not wrong, but here's the rough translation. Conventional farming is what most of the acreage in this country has been doing since after the war, when the salesmen showed up with the five-gallon drums and the promises. Regenerative is the older idea wearing new clothes, meaning you try to build the soil instead of mine it. Rotate the crops. Let the field rest. Keep the land working the way land is supposed to work.

Aunt Vi, who has never farmed a day in her life but who has been wrong about nothing since the Carter administration, to hear her tell it, read about this and said, "Well that's just what my father did." And she's not entirely wrong. Her father farmed the way most of them farmed before the chemical revolution. He didn't call it regenerative. He called it farming.

But here's what the thousand farms are starting to show. The ones building the soil are handling the wet years better. Handling the dry years better. Dirt with more life in it acts like a sponge instead of a parking lot, and that turns out to matter quite a lot when the weather can't seem to make up its mind. Big Earl at the grain elevator has been reading the commodity sheets since before I had my first mortgage. He treats those numbers like they came down engraved in stone. Earl knows the numbers. What Earl doesn't always know is the dirt, and those are not, it turns out, the same education.

The gap between knowing a thing and doing a thing is not a gap. It's a canyon. Most of us are standing on one side, hollering across, wondering why nobody over there can hear us.

Pastor Holmgren told me once that faith isn't what you believe on Sunday. It's what you do on Wednesday. He was talking about theology, or trying to, but I think he stumbled into something about soil without meaning to. You can say you believe in the land. You can put a bumper sticker on your truck. But what you do on Wednesday, when it's dry and the cover crop seed costs money and the conventional field next door looks just fine, that's the faith that counts.

The conventional argument has good numbers too, and I won't pretend otherwise because Big Earl would have words with me, and because it's true. Yield. Efficiency. Output per acre. People need to eat. The world runs on calories. But what the thousand farms are measuring isn't one season. It's what happens over time. And time has a way of revealing which side of that canyon you were actually standing on.

Now, the thousand farms aren't going to settle the Lindqvist argument. Nothing is going to settle that argument. I'm not even sure the argument is still about the field at this point. But the study might give both twins something they haven't had in a while, which is a reason to look at the same data and come away seeing the same thing. That's not peace. But it's closer to a conversation than six years of silence.

I keep thinking about what Lundgren might say if he ever found himself on a porch in the Bend, which he probably won't but probably should. Something like: the soil remembers. What you put in, what you took out, what you let rest, what you pushed past its limit. It remembers longer than the market does, longer than the policy does, longer than the argument does. And it answers. Not in words. In what grows, or what doesn't.

The canyon between knowing and doing is older than farming. It's just that farming makes it visible in a way that's harder to explain away. You can see it in the field. You can see it in the water table. You can see it in the Lindqvist twins not speaking, which is its own kind of evidence.

What's interesting about a thousand farms is that it's a lot of people who did the Wednesday thing, one way or another, and kept records about it. That's not nothing. That's how the dirt finally gets a voice in the argument.

The dirt doesn't care what you call it. It just knows what you did.

---