Rural Affairs

When the Bell Gets Rung

Eileen Pankow used to run the potluck sign-up sheet at the Lutheran church like she was managing a small country. Two columns, pencil only, no erasures. You signed up for a hot dish, you brought a…

By ·

Eileen Pankow used to run the potluck sign-up sheet at the Lutheran church like she was managing a small country. Two columns, pencil only, no erasures. You signed up for a hot dish, you brought a hot dish. That was the deal. Eileen had been doing it since before some of us were born, and she had never, not once, missed a funeral dinner.

So when Eileen stopped showing up, people noticed. Not in a loud way. In the way you notice when the grain elevator light is off at a time it's never off. You file it. You watch.

There'd been a wrist in a brace. A bruise she said was from the oven door. Then Harold started doing all the grocery shopping, and Harold was buying frozen lasagna, and anyone who had ever eaten Eileen's cooking understood that frozen lasagna was not a voluntary choice in that household. You didn't need a warrant. You just needed to have been paying attention.

The county deputy came out eventually. Talked to Eileen. Eileen said everything was fine. Deputy wrote it up. Unsubstantiated. Case closed.

Now, I want to stop here and explain what "unsubstantiated" means in a place like this, because it doesn't mean what it sounds like. It doesn't mean nothing happened. It means nobody saw it happen, nobody could prove it, and the person who could say something wasn't saying. That's a finding about the evidence. It is not a finding about the world. There is a difference, and the difference is not small.

What happened after the deputy left was more interesting. Harold's truck started having trouble on cold mornings. His snowblower went missing from the shed. A note appeared on his windshield, in handwriting everybody recognized and nobody would claim, that said simply: "We're watching." The men's Bible study started dropping by on Saturday mornings, not to talk scripture, just to sit on the porch and drink coffee and let Harold know, without a word of it said directly, that there were eyes on him and there would always be eyes on him. Harold moved away about a year later. Eileen stayed. She runs the potluck again.

I've been thinking about Eileen a lot since I read about Congressman Miller, the one from Ohio. His ex-wife told detectives he threw hot water at her, shoved her, held a gun to her head. Their two-year-old daughter turned up with a broken collarbone and a bruise that a child protection specialist said looked like a handprint. The police investigation came back unsubstantiated. Same word. Same finding.

Ninety-six members of the Democratic Women's Caucus are asking for a House ethics investigation. And I read that and think: well, that's one way to do it. Formal letters. Committee hearings. A finding that either sticks or doesn't. Very official. Very far from Eileen Pankow's kitchen.

But here's what I keep coming back to. What's the Chamberlain's Bend version of this? Who's sitting on the porch watching? Who's leaving notes on windshields? Who's showing up on a Saturday morning with coffee to let a man know that the town is looking and the town does not forget? Because the police report says unsubstantiated. But the bruise was the shape of a hand. The child's collarbone was broken. The gun was held to a head. That's not nothing. That's something the official process couldn't catch, and the official process not catching it does not make it disappear.

Washington has so many committees and so many procedures and so many ways to say "we looked into it" that it sometimes forgets that looking into something and knowing something are two different things. The ethics committee might investigate. They might find enough or they might not. But that little girl's collarbone is still going to be what it is, and the pattern of those allegations is still going to stack up like firewood in November whether a committee signs off on it or not.

Big Earl down at the grain elevator has a thing he says when someone brings him a commodity report that doesn't match what he's seeing in the fields. He says, "The numbers tell you what they measured. They don't tell you what they missed." Earl's not a complicated man, but he's right about that.

You can't investigate a bruise into not being a bruise. You can only decide whether to look at it or look away.

There's a saying around here, not elegant but true: you can't unring a bell. Emily Moreno told those detectives what she told them. That bell was rung. The question now is whether anyone in a position to answer it is going to pick up or just let it go to voicemail, which I understand is what Washington does with a great many things.

The ethics process exists for a reason, and I'm not saying it shouldn't run. I'm saying it's one tool, and tools have limits, and the limit of this particular tool is that it was designed to catch what can be caught on paper. Some things don't fit on paper. Some things fit better on a church potluck sign-up sheet, in the space where a name used to appear and now doesn't.

Aunt Vi, who has been wrong about nothing since the Carter administration (to hear her tell it), once said that a community's job isn't to prove things. It's to notice them. Courts prove things. Committees prove things. Communities notice, and remember, and act accordingly.

I don't know what Congress will do. I know what we'd do here.


Tags: Rural life and values, community and mutual aid, Congress and ethics, domestic violence and accountability, Midwest politics, public policy, small-town America

https://thesixthlense.com/article/when-the-bell-gets-rung · The Sixth Lense

Newer and older

More from Rural Affairs